Quick Links
Skip to main contentSkip to navigation

Missouri Association of School Administrators

Legislative Information/New Laws

Working...

Ajax Loading Image

 

MASA Legislative Priorities and Platform

MASA Legislative Priorities

2020-2021

 

The Missouri Association of School Administrators (MASA) represents the vast majority of school administrators serving public school districts in Missouri. The MASA Legislative Platform covers a multitude of issues that our members have identified which they support and oppose. While the subsequent pages detail these positions, the following three provisions represent MASA’s essential priorities for the 2021 Legislative Session.

           

Prioritizing Funding for Public Education: Missouri legislators have, in recent years, shown a commitment to fully funding our state’s foundation formula. For that, we are grateful. However, when the state encountered difficult economic times due to the pandemic, we saw significant withholds to the foundation formula, a substantive decrease in the school transportation categorical and a significant decrease in revenue to the Classroom Trust Fund (i.e., gaming). To date, public education has seen a reduction of approximately $350 million in state revenue ($246.6 million in withholds to the foundation formula for the June and July payments; a $78 million shortfall to the Classroom Trust Fund for FY 20; $15.9 million in withholds to the FY 20 Supplemental Budget for a prior year correction; and a $14.2 million reduction to the school transportation categorical). Although it is unknown if the economy will recover in time to increase revenue during the next legislative session, we urge legislators to make funding for public education a priority.

 

Increasing Accountability and Transparency for MOCAP Providers and Providing Public Schools Financial Flexibility for Virtual Enrollment Decisions: The pandemic has shown that a need for virtual instruction exists. However, the current structure we have in Missouri does not lend itself to proper oversight, accountability or transparency of MOCAP providers. As such, we urge DESE to undertake reforms by way of the rulemaking process to ensure MOCAP providers give school districts timely and meaningful student performance data. We further urge the Legislature to modify the current MOCAP statute to allow school districts greater financial flexibility in making virtual enrollment decisions as long as quality is still at the forefront. We also urge the Legislature to require MOCAP providers to provide greater financial transparency for all MOCAP expenditures.

 

Refocusing Priorities on Quality of Public Education: Continued access to a quality public education for all of Missouri’s children is critical to the future of our state. Over the past decade, efforts have increased to privatize public education via vouchers, voucher tax credits, virtual privatization and privately run charter schools. Open enrollment and other choice measures have also been advanced. These initiatives erode the foundation of a quality public education by diverting funding from local public schools. We believe the Legislature should prioritize the quality of public education and work with public school leaders to meet this challenge as opposed to the aforementioned harmful interferences which have proven to be ineffective, inefficient and unsustainable.

 

 

 

MASA Legislative Platform 

2020-2021

 

Education Policy 

Continuous improvement of the public education system being necessary to student success,

 

MASA Supports: 

  • Limiting charter school expansion until additional and effective accountability and transparency measures are placed on existing charter schools;
  • Replicating programs that have been proven effective in meeting the needs of students, specifically students that live in poverty or are considered “at-risk”; 
  • Providing specialized training for administrators, teachers and staff who work in high poverty areas or with diverse student populations that focus on the unique situations children face in their communities and culture; 
  • Dedicating funds for programs that train administrators to deliver effective and constructive teacher evaluations; 
  • Offering incentives and policy changes to assist the recruitment of talented college students into the education profession and retain them once they become teachers;  
  • Defining the parameters by which employees may collectively bargain including (1) ensuring the Board of Education as the decision-making body on any issue that may reach an impasse between administration and a bargaining group; (2) identifying issues and topics which may be the subject of bargaining negotiations; (3) clarification to the definition of labor organization; (4) setting stringent and significant penalties for anyone participating in a school strike; and (5) defining “good faith bargaining”;  
  • Continuing the independent governing structure of the PSRS/PEERS retirement systems;
  • Reinstatement of the 2.55 multiplier for PSRS members who have 31 years of service or more; 
  • Ensuring changes to work after retirement rules do not place a financial burden on school districts and provides maximum flexibility to allow school districts to fill positions where few quality applicants may exist;
  • Increasing Missouri’s graduation rates by offering incentives for students to stay in school and/or disincentives for dropping out; 
  • Ensuring students who graduate from a Missouri high school be eligible for all state financial aid made available by the state of Missouri; 
  • Ensuring the Department of Elementary and Secondary Education (DESE) has the resources needed to intervene and assist low performing school districts; and 
  • Continuing the current independence, structure, and governance of the Missouri High School Activities Association (MSHSAA);
  • Working to close the technological divide by increasing access to broadband internet across Missouri;
  • Allowing schools to choose the curriculum that meets the needs of their community while adhering to state standards; and
  • Creating approved pilot programs that would exempt districts from certain aspects of the state school improvement program in exchange for a continuous improvement effort that promotes financial and organizational efficiency while focusing on the unique needs of their communities.

 

MASA Opposes:

  • Basing a teacher’s pay, a district’s salary schedule, layoffs, or tenure solely on teacher evaluations;
  • Establishing an arbitrary percentage of student performance that must be used in employee evaluations;
  • Reducing the probationary period for teachers; and
  • Using outside arbitrators to resolve employment disputes. 

 

Finance

Resources being necessary to carry out the charge of public education in the state of Missouri,

 

MASA Supports:

  • Ensuring the foundation formula continues to be fully funded;
  • Fully funding the transportation formula;
  • Ensuring that a long-term plan is developed to fund Parents as Teachers and early childhood education programs in all school districts;
  • Funding the Small School appropriation for the formula;
  • Increasing the bonding capacity for school districts;
  • Funding to enhance student/school safety;
  • Creating a comprehensive state plan to address improvement of educator salaries;
  • Reforming Missouri’s tax credit programs by:
    • Placing a sunset clause on all current and future tax credit programs;
    • Making all new tax credit programs subject to the appropriations process;
    • Prohibiting the use of multiple tax credit programs on the same project, particularly the stacking of the low-income tax credit with the historic preservation tax credit;
    • Conducting a standardized, annual review of tax credit programs to monitor and report on each tax credit’s return on investment;
    • Tying the caps of tax credit programs to funding of categorical education spending;
    • Modifying the Circuit Breaker Tax Credit to increase the number of eligible participants; and
    • Placing a portion of the savings from tax credit reform in a dedicated fund for the improvement of school facilities and infrastructure;
  • Requiring the unanimous support of all taxing jurisdictions for any tax abatement project. If unanimous support cannot be achieved, the issue should either be put to a vote of the people in the affected taxing jurisdictions or schools should be given the ability to opt out of the abatement;
  • Providing resources to provide targeted professional development to school districts and their administrators so they may utilize the unique resources in their community to better address the mental healthcare of their students;
  • Reinstating flexibility of professional development funds to allow for alignment with district needs;
  • Consideration of revenue enhancements such as a tax on internet sales, tobacco taxes, alcohol taxes or a general sales tax to provide long-term funding for Missouri public schools;
  • Ensuring county assessors conduct accurate assessments to ensure true market value is obtained and penalizing assessors that fail to meet that task;
  • Allowing voters to approve bond issues with a simple majority;
  • Providing additional funding for technology, MOREnet, math and science equipment, Safe Schools Grants and alternative education programs;
  • Creating state funding for school facility replacement and/or improvement;
  • Exempting education spending from proposals, like the Taxpayer’s Bill of Rights that seek to put a cap on state spending;
  • Ensuring districts maintain discretion to evaluate the quality of virtual education offerings and the flexibility to make enrollment decisions that are in the best interest of students; and
  • Changes to the transportation hardship law that do not financially burden either the sending or receiving district. 

 

MASA Opposes:

  • Diverting state funds from the public schools by any means including tuition tax credits/vouchers;
  • Revenue reductions that impact the state’s ability to fund public education;
  • Mandating open enrollment of students to attend schools in districts in which their parents do not pay property taxes;
  • Any effort to reduce the amount of funding available to districts for summer school;
  • Mandating programs without appropriating the necessary funds to implement and sustain the programs;
  • Any effort to change the current process for determining the taxable assessed value and tax status of senior citizen living facilities in Missouri;
  • Imposing property tax reductions, freezes or limits;
  • Transforming the early childhood special education program from a required to a voluntary program;
  • Replacing the Missouri income tax with a sales tax;
  • Forcing consolidation of school districts;
  • Limiting the ability of school districts to seek civil, equitable and other legal remedies; and
  • Any effort to nullify election determinations based upon an arbitrary threshold of voter turnout.